Coaching Extemp

 

 

 

Tim Cook, Salado HS

Extemp Topic Analysis

Texas Speech & Debate Camp

 

 

 

 

 

 

This handout can be found at http://www.extemptopicanalysis.com/instruction.asp

 

 

 


Disclaimer

 

Not all the answers.

I want you contribute ideas!

 

Not a sales presentation.

 

This project is still under construction.

 


Objectives

 

Basic requirements you need to cover with students.

 

Provide 25 Helpful Hints.

 

Direct you to some excellent resources / materials.

 

 


Topics of discussion

 

 

Part One:  Speech

  1. Format
  2. Introductions / Conclusions
  3. Weaving
  4. Transition and Internal Summaries
  5. Source Cites
  6. Mandates
  7. Analysis

 

Part Two: Delivery

  1. Dress
  2. Vocal Style
  3. Fluency
  4. Gestures
  5. The Walk
  6. Cards
  7.  

Part Three:  Files

  1. Division
  2. Index
  3. Hard Copies
  4. Sources and Sites

 

Part Four:  Teaching

  1. Materials
  2. Before the tournament
  3. During the tournament
  4. After the tournament
  5. Lesson Plans
  6. Practice Strategies
  7. Grades
  8. Rubrics (Speeches/Files)
  9. Test

 

Addendum: Sample speech

 


 


Part One: Speech


                                                                                                                                     

 

What should I do in the extemp speech?

 

 

Simple, the speech must answer the question.   The speaker must have a clearly articulated reply to the question.  Many speakers will have a beautifully delivered 6 ˝ minute speech, but never answer the question.  These are the students you see in the cafeteria during finals.

 

A.  Format

 

 

All speeches must have an introduction, body and conclusion.  In competitive extemp, a rather rigorous standard has developed.  Mastering the format is the first step in the extemp process. 

 

 


Introduction

 

Attention Getter – also called a hook; it captures the audience interest

Connection – relate attention getter to the question

Question – state question word for word                                                     

Answer – briefly answer the question, answer should be clear and direct

Foreshadow – state your main points

 

Background – limited information to form a backdrop to speech or

Justification – tell the judge the importance of the topic.                     

 

Body

 

I. Main point                                                         

II. Main point                                                       

III. Main point                                                      

 

 

Conclusion

 

Repeat Main Points

Restate the Question

Reiterate your Answer

Link back to the Attention Getter and bring closure  

 

                                                                                                                       


Student worksheet to write an extemp speech

 

Introduction

 

Attention Getter

captures the audience interest (quote, joke, anecdote, startling fact, poem, etc.)

 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Connection

relate attention getter to question

 

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Question – state question word for word       

 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Answer – briefly answer the question, answer should be clear and direct

 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Foreshadow – state your main points

 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Background – limited information to form a backdrop to speech or

Justification – tell the judge the importance of the topic.                                            Use evidence.

 


Body

 

I. Main point

 

Analysis

 

Source

 

Importance

 

Analysis

 

Source

 

Importance

 

Internal Summary

 

Link to question

 

                                               

II. Main point

 

Analysis

 

Source

 

Importance

 

Analysis

 

Source

 

Importance

 

Internal Summary

 

Link to question

                                               

III. Main point

 

Analysis

 

Source

 

Importance

 

Analysis

 

Source

 

Importance

 

Internal Summary

 

Link to question

 

 

Conclusion

 

Repeat Main Points

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Restate the Question

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Reiterate your Answer

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Link back to the Attention Getter and bring closure  

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 


Introductions / Conclusions

 

          The introduction is the most important part of the speech.  You must “hook” the audience. 

 

 

A good introduction will:

 

1.     Hook the audience

2.     Set a framework or theme for the speech

3.     Set the mood for the speech

4.     Make the speaker “likeable”

 

Common techniques include:

 

1.     Jokes

2.     Rhetorical questions

3.     Anecdotes

4.     Fables

5.     Startling statistics

6.     Quotes

7.     Political cartoons

8.     Movie

 

A good conclusion will:

 

1.     Review

2.     Dispel any remaining doubts that the question was answered.

3.     Restate the thesis.

4.     Motivate the audience to think or do something.  An emotional response (topic’s importance, desire to resolve the problem, etc.)

5.     Provide a definite ending for the speech.  Tie a bow


 

 

1 Helpful Hint

 

Students should manuscript only the introduction to a speech.  They should write at least two drafts before reaching the final product.

 

This teaches them choosing the “perfect word” and format are important to a successful introduction.


Samples

 

     Woodrow Wilson in 1914 said, “The truth is our economic system is heartless.”  Now this may have been true in 1914, but is our economic system heartless today.  The  9 million unemployed Americans today would argue the system is heartless, merciless, cruel,  and even ruthless.  President Bush could be the first president since Herbert Hoover to witness the total number of jobs fall during his term. 3.2 million private sector jobs have vanished during the Bush term.  Hence, many people today are asking: Is Bush responsible for the record number of jobs that have been lost during his term?  The answer is no.  Bush may have been at the helm, but the ship was built before he was elected.  To fully understand my position I will develop two points: First, American manufacturing is in long-term decline and Bush does not have the power to reverse the trend;  Second, the administrations has enacted economic recovery programs, but time is needed for job growth.  With the current presidential election rhetoric, a proper understanding of this issue is imperative.  Bush is responsive to unemployment concerns and is acting. President Bush said while speaking to the International Union of Operating Engineers in Richfield, Ohio on Labor Day, “We’re committed to helping those who’ve got a job to keep a job and for those who are looking, to find a job.  We want people to be able to realize their personal dreams by working.”

   First, American manufacturing is in long-term decline and Bush does not have the power to reverse the trend…...

 

 

Two young engineers applied for a single position at a company. They both had the same qualifications. In order to determine which individual to hire, the applicants were asked to take a test.  Upon completion of the test, both men had each missed only one of the questions. The manager went to the first applicant and said, ‘’Thank you for your interest, but we’ve decided to give the job to the other applicant.’’ “And why would you be doing that? We both got nine questions correct,” asked the rejected applicant. “We have based our decision not on the correct answers, but on the question you missed,” said the department manager. “And just how would one incorrect answer be better than the other?” the rejected applicant inquired. ‘’Simple,’’ said the department manager, ‘’Your fellow applicant put down on question #5, ‘I don’t know.’ You put down, ‘neither do I.’’’ Searching for a job is not amusing; it can be stressful and even painful.  Currently 9 million people are unemployed in the United States.  President Bush could be the first president since Herbert Hoover to witness the total number of jobs fall during his term. 3.2 million private sector jobs have vanished during the Bush term.  Hence, many people today are asking: Is Bush responsible for the record number of jobs that have been lost during his term?  The answer is no.  Bush may have been at the helm, but the ship was built before he was elected.  To fully understand my position I will develop two points: First, American manufacturing is in long-term decline and Bush does not have the power to reverse the trend; second, the administrations has enacted economic recovery programs, but time is needed for job growth.  With the current presidential election rhetoric, a proper understanding of this issue is imperative.  Bush is responsive to unemployment concerns and is acting. President Bush said while speaking to the International Union of Operating Engineers in Richfield, Ohio on Labor Day, “We’re committed to helping those who’ve got a job to keep a job and for those who are looking, to find a job.  We want people to be able to realize their personal dreams by working.”

   First, American manufacturing is in long-term decline and Bush does not have the power to reverse the trend…...

 


 

 

2 Helpful Hints

 

Xerox this page and have students label the parts of the introduction.

 

Next, copy the final drafts of the introductions the students wrote.  Have students label the parts of those introduction.  They are identifying the parts, but also reading some “good” introductions they might use at the next tournament.


Rushin, Prearranged introductions

 

During my senior year, I became known on the extemp circuit as the “Joe Millionaire Guy” because in my two biggest rounds at TFA state, I chose to use what I felt was the most applicable and strongest introduction available to me. So, in TFA state semifinals and finals, I chose to use the same introduction each time. The tactic got to me finals and helped me succeed. Nevertheless, many would see this as cheap; I completely disagree. The bottom line is that almost every extemper in state finals and national finals has an array of pre-arranged introductions that they can use at different times. It is never good to rely on only one introduction, but having a set of 5-6 introductions that you use at different times is a very efficient way to not be too contrived and greatly enhance fluency at the beginning of your speech.

It is a good idea to use humor and make the introduction something in popular culture, a joke, and generally not a personal story. Here is my example:

 

TOPIC: How has the war in Iraq affected the Labour Party in the UK?

 

(AGD) FOX has always been the champion of quality television, whether it be a show in which supermodels are forced to work in foreign farm labor jobs, or whether it be a show in which average Americans compete for the opportunity to be publicly embarrassed by Simon Cowell. But perhaps FOX’s classiest show came in the fall of 2003 when a handful of women fought for the heart of one supposed millionaire. After weeks of fighting for his heart, one woman was crowned the winner and was allowed to marry the man, only to be told one small detail: The man whose heart she had won was in fact not a millionaire, but a construction worker who made 17,000 dollars a year.

 

(LINK) Now in the example of Joe Millionaire, the women involved in the show felt as if they were deceived by the FOX corporation, led to believe one thing only to find out that what they believed was in fact false. While the marriage between Joe Millionaire and his spouse might have been unsuccessful, a similar marriage of sorts, the marriage between the British Labour Party and populous of the UK will likely have a similar outcome. While it might be true that, according to the Economist of January 23rd 2005, Tony Blair’s Labour party was successful in the parliamentary elections even after the war in Iraq, nevertheless, as we analyze this area in greater detail and ask ourselves, “How has the war in Iraq affected the Labour Party in the UK?”, we discover that Joe Millionaire serves as a clear example. Just as the women on the television show felt deceived and lost trust in the FOX company, so have the British people lost trust in the Labour Party as a whole. To understand why, we can look back at the example of Joe Millionaire and thus the acronym JOE.

 

J- Justification for Iraq left British voters unsatisfied

O- Opposition parties have gained support

E- Economic impact of the war has exacerbated financial crisis

 

Weaving

 

Use the introductory technique throughout the speech, use it as a transition.  Don’t just have it on the top and bottom of the speech.  However, it should not become a filler or a replacement for content.

 

 

One of my favorite Aseop’s fables is the The Crow and the Pitcher:

 

A crow, half-dead with thirst, came upon a Pitcher which had once been full of water; but when the Crow put its beak into the mouth of the pitcher he found that only very little water was left in it, and that he could not reach far enough down to get at it.  He tried, and he tried, but at last had to give up in despair.  Then a thought came to him, and he took a pebble and he dropped it into the Pitcher. Then he took another pebble and dropped it into the pitcher.  Then he took another pebble and dropped that into the Pitcher.  Then he took another pebble and dropped that into the Pitcher. Then he took another pebble and dropped that into the Pitcher. Then he took another pebble and dropped that into the Pitcher. Then he took another pebble and dropped that into the Pitcher. Then he took another pebble and dropped that into the Pitcher.  At last, he saw the water mount up near him, and after casting in a few more pebbles he was able to quench his thirst and save his life.

 

The moral of the story:

Little by little does the trick.

 

 

In other words, the answers to our troubles may not always come immediately, or instantaneously.  We may have to take many steps before we finally reach the resolution.  A culture based on fast-food restaurants, cell phones and 24 hour photo processing, will find it difficult to accept this “incrementalism” or “gradualism.”  Just ask FEMA.  Nevertheless for many of our problems, the solution will only come “little by little.” Such is the case in Iraq – “little by little” we are making progress in Iraq and eventually we will be able to say we won the war in Iraq.

 

This is a significant war, a war we must win.  Air Force General Richard Myers said, “Winning the war in Iraq is as important to the United States as winning World War II was 60 years ago.  The outcome and consequences of defeat are greater than World War II.  If terrorism wins in Iraq, the next 9/11 is right around the corner."

 

Therefore it is imperative to ask the question: Is the US winning the War in Iraq?  Unconditionally, I must say yes.  Step by step, the United States is winning the war in Iraq.  The key to winning the war in Iraq is achieving stability and establishing democracy in Iraq.

 

First, little by little stability is being achieved in Iraq.  To achieve stability in Iraq, the insurgency must be minimized and Iraq has to establish an effective Iraqi army.

  

On September 29, The Washington Post reported, “President Bush warned yesterday that the bloodshed and violence by Iraqi extremists will escalate as the country moves into the last phase of its transition over the next three months…”

 

The surge in insurgency activity is not an indication that we are losing the war, but rather is a last ditch effort by the terrorists to cause civil unrest in the final stages of transition in Iraq.

 

According to Times Online, September 13, “we know…Abu Musab al-Zarqawi remains a very potent force.  He has many volunteers for suicide missions.  He is being supplied with men and probably money via Syria. (and) He is also the main insurgent force in western Baghdad.  Aside from his group there are three or four other main insurgent organizations, including former members of the Baathist regime and other Islamic militants.”

 

However, Air Force Captain Patrick Horn argued, “The insurgency is waning. This movement was never well organized and the ones who remain at odds with each other are losing the critical support of the populace.”

 

For example, the killing of al Qaeda's second-in-command in Iraq, Abdullah Abu Azzam, was as another little step in the Iraqi war.  President George W. Bush maintains the killing of Abu Azzam is a sign that the U.S. strategy in Iraq is defeating the insurgency.

 

The Christian Science Monitor quantified efforts to minimize the Iraqi insurgency on September 28, “According to American military officials, the US has either made key arrests or developed informants who have led to a cascade of actionable intelligence over the past month. Since the middle of August, the US has reported killing or capturing at least 16 members of Al Qaeda in Iraq, led by the Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.”

 

Colonel Stephen Davis contended little by little the insurgency is being minimized, "We are dismantling the network.  We are taking out the leaders, the facilitators, the financiers, the operational guys, and the foot solders."

 

    If expediency is the goal we should remember George Orwell's wise words, “The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it.”

 

    Therefore, Iraq is on the right  path to stability because the insurgency is little by little being minimized.  The next crucial step will be to establish an effective Iraq army.

 

    Reuters reported on September 28, “Iraqi forces are taking an increasing role in security operations and holding control of cities where military operations have flushed out insurgents.”

 

    To date, Iraq has a standing army over 190,000.  Seventy-five percent of Iraqi’s army is capable of engaging in combat, with U.S. troops providing support. More than 30 battalions are capable of taking the lead in an offensive. One battalion can operate entirely on its own.

 

    On September 19, Guardian Unlimited confirmed this, “The Bush administration and the Iraqi government claim to be making major strides in fielding a capable Iraqi army, a force said to be nearing 200,000 strong. The plan calls for the Iraqi force to increasingly take over control of the country from the 140,000 U.S. forces now leading the fight against a Sunni-dominated insurgency.”

 

    General George Casey, the senior U.S. commander in Iraq, argued little by little will do the trick.  General Casey said, “We say we make progress relentlessly in little steps a day at a time. And we just keep taking little steps.  And every once in a while, you get to see what happens when all those little steps yield something.''

 

    Given the minimization of the insurgency and establishment of an effective Iraqi army, stability is being achieved in Iraq and a pebble has therefore been placed in the pitcher.

 

 

 


 

Transition and Internal Summaries

    

 

    The speech must have transitions.  Transitions establish the connection between the main point just completed and next part of the speech.  Transitions allow the speaker to move from one place to another place in the speech.  They make the speech fit together.  Without transitions the speech will be choppy and hard to follow.  Practice transitions so they become routine. 

 

 

     Internal summaries and previews should also be included in the speech.  Think of each point as a speech within a speech.  After you present the transition and argumentative point, the speaker should preview the sub points.  When the speaker has developed the sub analysis, a brief summary of the point should be given.  Internal summaries should link back to the question and reinforce your answer to the question.

 

     Major transitions, moving to a new point, should also be highlighted nonverbally by taking three steps.  As a general rule when you move your feet, you should be saying a number.   


 

3 Helpful Hints

 

Tag team impromptu speeches

 

Divide class into groups of 5.  Each student will deliver a portion of the speech. 

 

Speaker #1 Intro

Speaker #2 Point 1

Speaker #3 Point 2

Speaker #4 Point 3

Speaker #5 Conclusion

 

 

While doing this activity, emphasize transitions.


 

Source Cites

 

     Sources increase a speaker's credibility.   Many people are from the school of thought "the more sources the better the speech." I disagree.  A good speaker will emphasize quality over quantity.  I literally have seen speakers dump so many sources that it left very little time for analysis.  Make sure you give the date and have a variety of sources.  I would also like to see more information about the source, what makes it a credible citation (authors credentials, based on a valid study). 

 

 

How to introduce sources

     Trade deficits are normal during times of industrial growth.  Therefore, we should not be troubled about the current trends. The National Review, which conducted an in-depth study of trade deficits, reported on February 24, 2003, “... recent data indicate that the trade balance tends to move in the opposite direction of growth in GDP. In other words, when the trade balance goes down (deeper deficits) the growth in GDP goes up. .... From 1997 until December of 2002, the trade balance and the U.S. economy have moved in almost exact opposite directions. This suggests that deficits tend to correlate with economic growth.” National Review established the consequence of trade deficits for us; the end result will eventually be positive economic growth for the U.S. economy.

 

How not to introduce sources

     Newsweek reported, "The global trading system is in trouble—mainly because it became over dependent on big U.S. trade deficits."  [This method offers no analysis, date, source legitimacy or impact for the evidence.]

 


Mandates

 

          I do this for the squad.  Where should we be as a team, every student may not be at that stage of development.

 

 

 

For example:

 

1.     Find the file after you draw

2.     Give the speech

3.     No cards

4.     5-6 minutes

5.     6 sources

 

Build on these throughout the year.

 

 


Analysis

 

    How you analyze the question will have a major effect on the outcome of the speech.  Poor analysis will only result in an ineffective answer to the question. 

 

Determine the “Heart” of the question:

 

1.     Identify the question’s thesis.

2.     Determine relevant factors.

 

 

     When determining the appropriate organizational pattern, there should really be only one factor: the answer to the question should determine the body of the speech.  Irrelevant material should not be included in the speech.  If the information does not answer the question, then it does not belong in the speech.

 


 Take for example these traditional patterns:

 

Past/Present/Future

 

Example: Is Social Security doomed?

I. Past

II. Present

III. Future

 

Problem/Solution

 

Example: What should the government do to prevent terrorism?

I. Problem

II. Solution

 

Cause/Effect/Solution

 

Example: School Finance: How should we reform it?

I. Cause

II. Effect  

III. Solution

 

     In the first example, the only part of the speech that is germane to the question is the third point.  The second example does not need a discussion of the problem.  And the third example, definitely does not need the effect, maybe you could convince me the cause is relevant.

 


 

     To avoid these errors, use a pattern called unified analysis.  With this organizational pattern, the body of the speech serves as a justification for the answer, the organizational pattern unifies all the analysis.  Typically, requires organizing the speech with two main points and two sub points for each main point.  Unified analysis has been called the "one best organizational pattern."

 

Examples

 

 

Closed Questions:  ask for a yes or no answer

 

 

Example: Is North Korea a threat? Yes

I. North Korea's political leadership is fanatical and extreme.

II. Possession of nuclear weapons presents unique risks.

 

 

Open Questions:  ask for sequential steps in proposing the answer

 

 

 

Example: How can the federal government best protect the public from terrorism?

Provide state and local government with funds and increase intelligence.

 

I. State and local government are on the front line and need funding.

II. Intelligence is key to prevention.

 

 

4 Helpful Hints

 

Have students write several questions on a given topic.

They will see different questions require different speeches.

 

For example:

 

Iran

Does the US have the “will” to stand up to Iran?

Is Iran a strategic threat to the United States?

Is Iran ready for 'serious negotiations'?

Is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad trying to start a war with the West?

Iranian nuclear program: Can the West and Iran find a diplomatic solution?

Has Western pressure on Iran over its nuclear program helped or hindered human-rights efforts in Iran?

Can the US persuade all members of the UN Security Council to impose sanctions on Iran?

Is Iran entitled to a nuclear power program as a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty?

What does U.N. Resolution 1696 mandate?

 

 

 

Choosing a topic:

 

1.  You must understand terms of the topic.

 

2.  Can you identify the intent of the topic? 

 

2.  Discard topics you cannot answer.

 

3.  Use the following criteria with the remaining topics:

 

  • Can you develop a position?
  • Which will be appealing to the audience?
  • How much and how diverse is the information you have?

 

 

 


 


Part Two: Delivery


 

How should the extemp speech be delivered?

 

    The short version, it should be professional and polished.  Your delivery should be "lively," not boring. 

 

                  


Some Extemp Lessons...

Stephen Rushin

 

Lesson 1: Extemp is an act

 

    So often people perceive extemp as an event where the most intelligent and the best read students win. While there is no doubting that being well read and intelligent helps your chances, it is rarely the smartest person who wins the tournament. Rather, the more a student does extemp the more she/he realizes that extemp is nothing more than an act, a performance like any interpretation event. In Prose the objective is to offer the most satisfying performance of the literature you are presenting. Extemp is no different.

 

    The objective of extemp is to offer the most believable, fluent, and intelligent sounding speech possible. Now this isn’t to say that one should sacrifice quality for clarity completely, but an extemporaneous speaker must find the moderate balance between fluency and intelligent analysis.

 

 

Must read